From owner-freebsd-security Mon Nov 16 10:11:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA10008 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 10:11:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.sminter.com.ar (ns1.sminter.com.ar [200.10.100.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA09998 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 10:11:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fpscha@ns1.sminter.com.ar) Received: (from fpscha@localhost) by ns1.sminter.com.ar (8.8.5/8.8.4) id PAA01939; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 15:11:17 -0300 (GMT) From: Fernando Schapachnik Message-Id: <199811161811.PAA01939@ns1.sminter.com.ar> Subject: Re: Would this make FreeBSD more secure? In-Reply-To: <0qI4qUS00YUq09JbU0@andrew.cmu.edu> from Thomas Valentino Crimi at "Nov 16, 98 11:06:56 am" To: tcrimi+@andrew.cmu.edu (Thomas Valentino Crimi) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 15:11:16 -0300 (GMT) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org En un mensaje anterior, Thomas Valentino Crimi escribió: [...] > And then we have md5 passwords, arguably broken, now, but orders of > magnitudes better than DES. Broken? I'm using them with no problem. What do you mean? Regards. Fernando P. Schapachnik Administracion de la red S&M International SA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message