From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 12 20:15:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648A516A41A for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:15:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnemeth@vtn1.victoria.tc.ca) Received: from vtn1.victoria.tc.ca (vtn1.victoria.tc.ca [199.60.222.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142DE43D6E for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:15:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jnemeth@vtn1.victoria.tc.ca) Received: from vtn1.victoria.tc.ca (jnemeth@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vtn1.victoria.tc.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5CKEwFN029909; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:14:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jnemeth@localhost) by vtn1.victoria.tc.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5CKEvgZ029908; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200606122014.k5CKEvgZ029908@vtn1.victoria.tc.ca> From: jnemeth@victoria.tc.ca (John Nemeth) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:14:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" "RE: wikipedia article" (Nov 1, 6:11pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" , "Nikolas Britton" , "Ted Unangst" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 199.60.222.3 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:36:33 +0000 Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E1morszky_Bal=E1zs?= , misc@openbsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, netbsd-users@NetBSD.org Subject: RE: wikipedia article X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:15:00 -0000 On Nov 1, 6:11pm, "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote: } } Prior to the release of the 80386 the Intel processors didn't have } memory protection which was a requirement of any processor running } the BSD kernel. This is not entirely true. The 80286 had memory protection. However, its memory protection was completely based on segments (i.e. it could not do paging). Also, it was only a 16 bit processor. These two items combined to make it very difficult to run a modern Unix-like system. However, it did run Xenix as well as various other systems. The 80386 was the first processor with paging (which all modern virtual memory systems are based around) and 32 bits. }-- End of excerpt from "Ted Mittelstaedt"