Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 May 2015 08:34:55 -0500
From:      Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Performance issues with raspberry pi 2
Message-ID:  <1431610495.1880104.268703721.32988B01@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOx9_Zgg7X_-hdA6PJKWHD-zSPVYvnhq8kEuNmHxytQULVMgmA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAOx9_ZiUw5nkBK=Bsumb=K2W1hv0P%2BNAwT7OXE7VAz_96awqOw@mail.gmail.com> <1EE88AD4-2B4A-496B-9366-7F9A89F57D6D@bsdimp.com> <CAOx9_Zgg7X_-hdA6PJKWHD-zSPVYvnhq8kEuNmHxytQULVMgmA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, May 14, 2015, at 01:39, Andreas Andersson wrote:
> Just built an image for the raspberry pi without the witness options..
> Will
> try to build with TARGET_ARCH=armv6hf later on. Eager to test the
> performance of tornadoweb on the rpi first. :)
> 
> Will come back with benchmarks later. What else would be nice to
> benchmark?
> Is there a standard set of benchmarks that I can run and provide results
> for?
> 

I would be interested in seeing comparable benchmarks between Linux,
FreeBSD, and NetBSD on the rpi keeping the environments as similar as
possible.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1431610495.1880104.268703721.32988B01>