From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 14 13:34:56 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C4BB3E7
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 May 2015 13:34:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.28])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6000D1A90
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 May 2015 13:34:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A5E20B9D
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 May 2015 09:34:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213])
 by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 14 May 2015 09:34:55 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=gz08tN7zT9jnpPd
 PVG42p+XfPno=; b=YZ/ttwTt/QICzn/JuEA8S/qqm8aHKakxjrFfbtWLwhP5ZvO
 GR7frXjG3WzDZhxzIeEF7HR3BjChPK4gnsOowQYuJCYhlQkoyINv3iOLRhqyDAHM
 vw5kVDxMcgrygi3p/T6BTpp2/JdUoaRY3tDfuXSJ3158dUzxOU6dqlgANZuM=
Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99)
 id 1EEAB118C13; Thu, 14 May 2015 09:34:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1431610495.1880104.268703721.32988B01@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Sasl-Enc: 3huj9wjSP0aDoH/OJsrXndbgYZ8J5fet4l7rpJKQ9gOZ 1431610495
From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-e7ca9928
In-Reply-To: <CAOx9_Zgg7X_-hdA6PJKWHD-zSPVYvnhq8kEuNmHxytQULVMgmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOx9_ZiUw5nkBK=Bsumb=K2W1hv0P+NAwT7OXE7VAz_96awqOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1EE88AD4-2B4A-496B-9366-7F9A89F57D6D@bsdimp.com>
 <CAOx9_Zgg7X_-hdA6PJKWHD-zSPVYvnhq8kEuNmHxytQULVMgmA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Performance issues with raspberry pi 2
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 08:34:55 -0500
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 13:34:56 -0000



On Thu, May 14, 2015, at 01:39, Andreas Andersson wrote:
> Just built an image for the raspberry pi without the witness options..
> Will
> try to build with TARGET_ARCH=armv6hf later on. Eager to test the
> performance of tornadoweb on the rpi first. :)
> 
> Will come back with benchmarks later. What else would be nice to
> benchmark?
> Is there a standard set of benchmarks that I can run and provide results
> for?
> 

I would be interested in seeing comparable benchmarks between Linux,
FreeBSD, and NetBSD on the rpi keeping the environments as similar as
possible.