From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 06:25:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51429106564A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35858FC15 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhr7 with SMTP id hr7so2320292wib.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:25:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=PGDxoE7zt1KZdLV1kWTWD9g343uSX4R9YMCUCBaXEw8=; b=lK2OIfkHmWzkp8vkJ0upjr+DZfCTrS4Yte69eYZuSLROTFQBbRtKxheR/hGRMTWlMI vet3eLH4mw84CoIr73iyn5XGsltsJbKLcht/HjgFEWmRNdd5R1lDPXItxMuDOiE9MA8h ypNw9Tic/gyjWRoFFn0QV8PRpADRo3hOAkIH99vsPSj+aCOld4ddgiYj7qFIUH8rnKmr wnYffgMLE8QXzP+G5UfXW4m9bbgknbebj+PQORVzkovDQY2q1gTXMQAhsAqBYjpwHxIk RsHr9UT905VHcV0NlXLnqf8cLkeWInacrMZz/z8Lm7RK5jkjcoVWWUjT0JDU4BrEstrc ZW8g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.197.104 with SMTP id s82mr2793363wen.62.1348813521654; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.66.194 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:25:21 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Jx4CcKeCycL0gRbiJUgs_fi-4rY Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: office@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Problem with aspell update X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:25:29 -0000 The recent update to aspell allows the option of building the ispell wrapper. This produces a conflict with the actual ispell port, but there were two CONFLICTS statements added, one is correctly conditional on the ispell wrapper option, but the other is unconditional. Could the first be removed so that port can be installed with ispell? I've filed PR ports/172131 on the issue. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com