From owner-freebsd-java Wed Aug 21 18:44:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3EB37B400 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 18:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC77043E42 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 18:44:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #6) id 17hh1Z-000P62-00; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 02:44:37 +0100 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7M1ia3H016484; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 02:44:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7M1ian4016483; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 02:44:36 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 02:44:36 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: Dylan Carlson Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Good distributed app technique for Java FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20020822014436.GC16407@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20020822012251.GA16283@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200208212133.09593.absinthe@pobox.com> <20020822013623.GA16407@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200208212140.54805.absinthe@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208212140.54805.absinthe@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org | > So you used a client that talked to servlets via HTTP that talked to | > components via RMI? | | Yup, exactly. In this particular application used ICE as the protocol between | the client and the servlet. The servlet talks to other servlets via RMI. | Oracle backend. All the front-end machines FreeBSD 4.6 with the native SDK | build. | Don't know much in the area of EJB myself. But I do know that going the EJB | route is almost an entirely different school of thought. Interesting. I thought servlets were best for dealing with http requests, yet you were using them as components? Since they were also interfacing with a DB on the backend, how is this so different from EJB components? jm -- My other computer is your Windows box. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message