From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 4 10:41:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D36F12E for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zimbra2.tngtech.com (zimbra2.tngtech.com [212.204.93.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01A415F2 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra2.tngtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE2C9CE10B for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:41:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tngtech.com Received: from zimbra2.tngtech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra2.tngtech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wcEHH3parbtE for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:40:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from hactar.localnet (hactar.int.tngtech.com [10.1.2.115]) by zimbra2.tngtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFD769CE0E7 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:40:57 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Wendler To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kind of hacky fix for banshee-2.6.0 Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:40:57 +0100 Message-ID: <2093792.KXDdxCWCWG@hactar> Organization: TNG Technology Consulting GmbH User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (FreeBSD/9.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1386093729.5203.55046221.21CD5331@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <3074012.QmsohyHcnK@hactar> <1386093729.5203.55046221.21CD5331@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:41:28 -0000 On Tuesday 03 December 2013 12:02:09 Mark Felder wrote: > Are all of these files Makefile.in or Makefile.am ? If so, this patch= > would fix it: Hey, that's a nice hint. I've seen somthing similar in the doc right af= ter=20 I've sent the mail.=20 I am currently trying to figure out how to adapt the REINPLACE_CMD to n= ot only=20 change the line but to add the variable where it is not present. I thin= k I=20 have to play around a bit here, see how other ports solved this Thx for the patch. This helped alot! Cheers, Stefan --=20 Stefan Wendler stefan.wendler@tngtech.com +49 (0) 176 - 2438 3835 Senior Consultant TNG Technology Consulting GmbH, Betastr. 13a, 85774 Unterf=F6hring Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Henrik Klagges, Gerhard M=FCller, Christoph Stock Amtsgericht M=FCnchen, HRB 135082