Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:18:01 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: Christopher Sean Hilton <chris@vindaloo.com> Cc: Johan Hendriks <Johan@double-l.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does softupdate help squid ? Message-ID: <20080318221801.493bafeb@meijome.net> In-Reply-To: <632D48BA-ADCC-4E0F-AFE9-46806B0B1AD7@vindaloo.com> References: <47DE312E.2030209@esiee.fr> <AFEDF01E-ECB0-43E9-9F64-E678FA88E644@vindaloo.com> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DDCA8@w2003s01.double-l.local> <632D48BA-ADCC-4E0F-AFE9-46806B0B1AD7@vindaloo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:26:11 -0400
Christopher Sean Hilton <chris@vindaloo.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the enlightenment. My understanding is that Squid can do
> both forward and reverse proxy. At least it it would seem so since
> that's the way I'm using it. I did not know that varnish cannot be
> used as a forward proxy though. As I said before, varnish is on my
> list of things to investigate since it seems to have a much more
> modern design than squid.
Varnish does look very interesting (specially the configuration side of
things). But, as you point out, it seems a more specific than Squid (or squid
more flexible, whatever :) ).
btw, does Squid 3 finally implement ESI?
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
Albert Einstein
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080318221801.493bafeb>