From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Nov  5 09:52:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA24919
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 09:52:21 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from mb06.swip.net (mb06.swip.net [193.12.122.210])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA24912
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 09:52:14 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from lf@get2net.dk)
From: lf@get2net.dk
Received: from germs_client (port19.pulje101.get2net.dk [195.82.192.19]) 
          by mb06.swip.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP 
          id SAA04342; 
          Wed, 5 Nov 1997 18:52:07 +0100 (MET)
Date: Wed,  5 Nov 97 18:46:38 +0100
Subject: Re: NFS vs. NT Client! 
To: leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.co
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Chameleon ATX 6.0.1, Standards Based IntraNet Solutions, NetManage Inc.
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <9711031801.AA15954@gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com> 
Message-ID: <Chameleon.878752316.lars.falch@germs_client>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Marty,

>You don't quantify this with any numbers...How is the read 
>performance?

I don't really have any statistics on it - but it is extremely 
slow, compared to the write speeds.

>You also might want to look at samba and compare the two...

That would be my second choice - although I would prefer NFS, 
because of the compatibility.

How does SAMBA work with Windows NT as a client?


regards,
Lars