From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 16 11:26:17 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA25304 for current-outgoing; Sat, 16 Mar 1996 11:26:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA25299 Sat, 16 Mar 1996 11:26:15 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA17685; Sat, 16 Mar 1996 12:19:57 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199603161919.MAA17685@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: -current and accelx To: terry@safetynet.net (Terry Lambert) Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 12:19:57 -0700 (MST) Cc: dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au, toor@dyson.iquest.net, sos@FreeBSD.org, coredump@nervosa.com, mmead@Glock.COM, current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199603160228.TAA14695@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Mar 15, 96 07:28:53 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > When the parent forks, and there is mapped memory, unless the MAP_INHERIT > flag is present, the child process should lose the mapping to the address > space, in all cases. Ugh. This is a screwup on my part. It should say "execs", not "forks". Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.