From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 14:37:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5E216A401 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16DA13C4B9 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7872084; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:37:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C13B207E; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:37:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6440EA1073; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:37:15 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Szab=F3_P=E9ter?= References: <003401c7712a$f71ebb60$6502a8c0@peteruj> <005c01c77134$28e0fce0$6502a8c0@peteruj> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:37:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <005c01c77134$28e0fce0$6502a8c0@peteruj> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Szab?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=F3_P=E9ter's?= message of "Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:25:23 +0200") Message-ID: <86zm5xph7o.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raid3 is slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:37:24 -0000 Szab=F3 P=E9ter writes: > # graid3 list > > Geom name: nmivol > State: DEGRADED First of all, your array is degraded. The graid3 output shows only four components. Unless the missing fifth component happens to be the parity disk, geom_raid3 will have to reconstruct your data on the fly. Second, you say nothing about which spindles the components are on and how those spindles are attached to the system. If some of those components are on the same spindle, or if some of those spindles are on the same ATA channel, performance will suffer considerably. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no