Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:21:25 -0800
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Cc:        Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: another gpt vs mbr (sanity) check
Message-ID:  <252BDE43-6021-486A-B4BD-E003F4B07B1A@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B958210.70108@icyb.net.ua>
References:  <E1Noh4B-000JjD-5u@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <3158041B-8E00-4A87-8172-741C0AE57131@mac.com> <4B954367.3070804@icyb.net.ua> <FB4B329E-807F-4A47-A86B-AE3BC049A6DC@mac.com> <4B9544B3.80203@icyb.net.ua> <03BFAAEC-6C59-48EF-BED9-2E68ED03E2B6@mac.com> <4B956533.2010900@icyb.net.ua> <D90F9986-8BD1-46C8-995B-C79D9821B496@mac.com> <4B958210.70108@icyb.net.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 8, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> 
>> In short, Apple bootcamp creates an invalid PMBR according to their
>> own technote.
> 
> It's not only the technote, it's the GPT spec itself.

Actually, no. The spec clearly states that LBA 0 contains a
protective MBR for the GPT format (UEFI 2.0, paragraph 5.3.1
on page 90). Paragraph 5.2 just the background information so
that there's something to refer to...

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt@mac.com






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?252BDE43-6021-486A-B4BD-E003F4B07B1A>