From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  8 21:20:46 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C959106566B
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  8 May 2010 21:20:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD128FC17
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  8 May 2010 21:20:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so251983wwd.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 08 May 2010 14:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=cBtnz78WorIreM+N4QrM0TOrLSDZzWQMeT34NkJHMb0=;
	b=OdFrZuKB0kQnR0C+61OhjFPs9X77REDRGqx2EFpMA9winXlgHwwkCUSeELHrMF3pAG
	KWKoRfkfYY2rzcM1gblB1lzF4/Rc3hxOJxk39xkDWYA4mEG28hkzMM+RyHsp2Gg3TnF1
	odhjjCfVMv68d8OeXMrIKt2RqPTMSu/T6cOrk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
	:content-type;
	b=lU6r6mwzq79CEK48r3be7X/ToUffilch+JVNILaz2LJVtbHGf9DlkwwIajxwdzIeGN
	ditrzpNtxslBs/Px8HKXuAwU3JXLY00xfGq7ITTueWuEJwBzUnFfHyG6WYnEmacA12uH
	lkBNyGRMQZtpwMg7MXIHAYmBcU1E23dDo8zCA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.88.85 with SMTP id z63mr1036516wee.105.1273353634268; Sat, 
	08 May 2010 14:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.163.21 with HTTP; Sat, 8 May 2010 14:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 21:20:34 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTil0Gs3shexWm28gceSFpvIeJKfMAYEk9_t4jmzH@mail.gmail.com>
From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: alc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Recent sys/vm/ changes and nvidia-driver
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 21:20:46 -0000

On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>>> I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days.  This round of
>>> changes
>>> are not yet complete.

What performance differences, if any, can we expect on uniprocessors
from the vm page lock-related changes? Kip's original post on -arch
mentioned some performance improvements and no significant
regressions, but on a dual 4-core machine.

b.