From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 17:30:38 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E5116A419 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serguey-grigoriev@yandex.ru) Received: from webmail27.mail.yandex.net (webmail27.mail.yandex.net [213.180.200.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B1C13C503 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serguey-grigoriev@yandex.ru) Received: from YAMAIL (webmail27) by mail.yandex.ru id S5567418AbXKPRKP for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:10:15 +0300 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Received: from [91.122.49.58] ([91.122.49.58]) by mail.yandex.ru with HTTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:10:13 +0300 From: "S.N.Grigoriev" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <18741195233013@webmail27.yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:10:13 +0300 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.3 or FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:30:38 -0000 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:31:19 +0000 (GMT) Robert Watson wrote: > I feel that the 7.0 kernel will prove to be one of our most stable, > not to mention most performant, .0 releases to date. Unfortunately, that's not true. For example, parallel printing crashes my amd64 system since the beginning of May. I've posted PR (kern/116669) which is still open. Some other people have reported about similar problems. To my mind it's a stopper defect for 7.0 because parallel printing is one of the basic computer tasks. FreeBSD was one of the best print servers for years. But at present it cannot be used in such a role (at least on amd64). Regards, Serguey.