From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 10 11:29:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt011n66.san.rr.com (dt011n66.san.rr.com [204.210.13.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60BA14DB9; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 11:29:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt011n66.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA05151; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 11:29:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <3800DAEE.25629988@gorean.org> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 11:29:02 -0700 From: Doug Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT-0927 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug in DNS implementations? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > > I've been trying to track down a problem with reverse DNS lookups > on a 3.1 system most of the day, and I may have found it. Has anyone else > seen this? The rev DNS for the box is handled by an NT machine, 5.6.7.1, Without telling us the actual IP's and hostnames involved it's not possible to properly diagnose this problem. That said, NT's DNS implementation is notorious for its interoperability problems. Good luck, Doug -- "Stop it, I'm gettin' misty." - Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message