From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Tue Apr 17 07:30:48 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C19F88978 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 07:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from mailout01.t-online.de (mailout01.t-online.de [194.25.134.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 639B075700 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 07:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from fwd40.aul.t-online.de (fwd40.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.139]) by mailout01.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id EBC4442CE9DB; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:30:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Stefans-MBP-LAN.fritz.box (SODx4oZDohH4jw-2CEVmKU+YdK2xh0-7ZQQs-UH1EYmVTWRru6WDYgI57cAf8gfQWh@[84.154.107.172]) by fwd40.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1f8L4X-0FqEhE0; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:30:37 +0200 Subject: Re: Realtek re(4) driver References: From: Stefan Esser Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=se@freebsd.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFVxiRIBCADOLNOZBsqlplHUQ3tG782FNtVT33rQli9EjNt2fhFERHIo4NxHlWBpHLnU b0s4L/eItx7au0i7Gegv01A9LUMwOnAc9EFAm4EW3Wmoa6MYrcP7xDClohg/Y69f7SNpEs3x YATBy+L6NzWZbJjZXD4vqPgZSDuMcLU7BEdJf0f+6h1BJPnGuwHpsSdnnMrZeIM8xQ8PPUVQ L0GZkVojHgNUngJH6e21qDrud0BkdiBcij0M3TCP4GQrJ/YMdurfc8mhueLpwGR2U1W8TYB7 4UY+NLw0McThOCLCxXflIeF/Y7jSB0zxzvb/H3LWkodUTkV57yX9IbUAGA5RKRg9zsUtABEB AAHNLlN0ZWZhbiBFw59lciAoVC1PbmxpbmUpIDxzdC5lc3NlckB0LW9ubGluZS5kZT7CwH8E EwEIACkFAlhtTvQCGwMFCQWjmoAHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBH67Xv Wv31RAn0B/9skuajrZxjtCiaOFeJw9l8qEOSNF6PKMN2i/wosqNK57yRQ9AS18x4+mJKXQtc mwyejjQTO9wasBcniKMYyUiie3p7iGuFR4kSqi4xG7dXKjMkYvArWH5DxeWBrVf94yPDexEV FnEG9t1sIXjL17iFR8ng5Kkya5yGWWmikmPdtZChj9OUq4NKHKR7/HGM2dxP3I7BheOwY9PF 4mhqVN2Hu1ZpbzzJo68N8GGBmpQNmahnTsLQ97lsirbnPWyMviWcbzfBCocI9IlepwTCqzlN FMctBpLYjpgBwHZVGXKucU+eQ/FAm+6NWatcs7fpGr7dN99S8gVxnCFX1Lzp/T1YzsBNBFVx iRIBCACxI/aglzGVbnI6XHd0MTP05VK/fJub4hHdc+LQpz1MkVnCAhFbY9oecTB/togdKtfi loavjbFrb0nJhJnx57K+3SdSuu+znaQ4SlWiZOtXnkbpRWNUeMm+gtTDMSvloGAfr76RtFHs kdDOLgXsHD70bKuMhlBxUCrSwGzHaD00q8iQPhJZ5itb3WPqz3B4IjiDAWTO2obD1wtAvSuH uUj/XJRsiKDKW3x13cfavkad81bZW4cpNwUv8XHLv/vaZPSAly+hkY7NrDZydMMXVNQ7AJQu fWuTJ0q7sImRcEZ5EIa98esJPey4O7C0vY405wjeyxpVZkpqThDMurqtQFn1ABEBAAHCwGUE GAEKAA8FAlVxiRICGwwFCQWjmoAACgkQR+u171r99UQEHAf/ZxNbMxwX1v/hXc2ytE6yCAil piZzOffT1VtS3ET66iQRe5VVKL1RXHoIkDRXP7ihm3WF7ZKy9yA9BafMmFxsbXR3+2f+oND6 nRFqQHpiVB/QsVFiRssXeJ2f0WuPYqhpJMFpKTTW/wUWhsDbytFAKXLLfesKdUlpcrwpPnJo KqtVbWAtQ2/o3y+icYOUYzUig+CHl/0pEPr7cUhdDWqZfVdRGVIk6oy00zNYYUmlkkVoU7MB V5D7ZwcBPtjs254P3ecG42szSiEo2cvY9vnMTCIL37tX0M5fE/rHub/uKfG2+JdYSlPJUlva RS1+ODuLoy1pzRd907hl8a7eaVLQWA== Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org To: Dieter BSD Message-ID: <364c2505-ffac-c213-6c95-048b02212ffb@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:30:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: SODx4oZDohH4jw-2CEVmKU+YdK2xh0-7ZQQs-UH1EYmVTWRru6WDYgI57cAf8gfQWh X-TOI-MSGID: 5451da2d-3c8b-4bbf-a5fa-b077f3e00c90 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 07:30:48 -0000 Am 16.04.18 um 23:23 schrieb Dieter BSD: > test results with nc(1) are kinda screwy. Maybe nc is the > wrong tool, maybe I'm using it wrong, I don't know. > > Has anyone tried similar testing? > Suggestions of knobs to turn, or other things to try? > > I need to receive data via UDP without dropping packets. Closed source sucks, > but I'm stuck with it, and thus with UDP. Well, but you know that the U in UDP means unreliable? On a non-congested link, UDP packets should arrive at the receiver, but the application has to deal with packet loss, since it cannot be sure that it is used on a reliable link. Packet loss will cause reduced throughput (as with TCP), unless it can be dealt with by FEC or other means (which also reduce throughput). Regards, STefan