From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 9 13:35:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6891065673 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f207.google.com (mail-fx0-f207.google.com [209.85.220.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CE98FC25 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so253366fxm.43 for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:34:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/55NoES/ZhkkYotuDBAX8k49cfsPCy/ZJpBrjE1huog=; b=DkmmMJWDl0pUQHVz60+eF8XXT4nyrHG73heFbFmIo33TxaBlfH71OMI0KX4aDudAQJ EtEorcz1j/PNtkf1lAGhTztIN5Xd7m5jXIGENjRAIfusrBOoUUAiorWsnuvMajTX6sDV Rr68IJeuKxrdNIPnYHv7GrbM+Ba1OHLtJIlRc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uP+4Ifw7Sn81LuQnTZz78XgXFMNRpvJDVtszPGv861014StH14ueS4t7Yrfus/r4Bx s4bGgFT7FwLuI8tqVQeMifCBNhIwF4jAJb6tPcJiCAZtc/kZYMALHHk70S0OO0kJo6WE coK2zU0UKha+K3oj7ZHBVPY6aTCa5K4/FA8i4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.4 with SMTP id o4mr137012bkg.10.1244554497199; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:34:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090609111703.GA98742@chateau.d.lf> References: <86skifqn2x.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <200906081647.15069.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090609111703.GA98742@chateau.d.lf> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:34:56 +0000 Message-ID: <3a142e750906090634w10e275d3wcaf76f5f117c8f9f@mail.gmail.com> From: "Paul B. Mahol" To: Ashish SHUKLA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.2-RELEASE panics with snd_ds1 loaded. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:35:05 -0000 On 6/9/09, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: > Hi Mel, > > Thanks for responding. > > In <200906081647.15069.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>, Mel > Flynn wrote: > > [...] > >>Nothing points to the sound module specifically. The first trace is >> unusable >>(frames missing) and the second trace panics in sleep, which maybe points >> to >>the sound module and interrupts. Are you not able to panic the system >> without >>that sound module loaded? It looks too random to blame one module, more >>hardware, but it's possible the module exposes a bug elsewhere. From this >>though, it is hard to tell. > > Yes, I noticed myself, that there is no reason why to blame 'sound' module > for > it. But I noticed my box only panics when there is some activity going on > with > sound device, like at one time, it paniced when I was trying to record audio > using gnome-sound-recorder, and another it paniced when I was playing audio > using ogg123. And that it too, it didn't panic immediately after start of > operation (playing/recording), but only after some time has elapsed. And the > system doesn't panic without snd_ds1 loaded even after building ports (like > openjdk6 and libxul) and using GNOME for 4 hours. BtW, I forgot to mention > in > last post, but I'm running the GENERIC kernel bundled with 7.2-RELEASE DVD. > > I don't know how to resolve and whether this is some kind of memory issue or > something else. I also experienced something similar panic situation[1] with > 8.0-CURRENT which no one else is able to reproduce except me, after which I > installed 7.2-RELEASE. Any ideas how to trace this problem, it is > discouraging > me to continue using FreeBSD for my regular desktop use ? > > References: > [1] - > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2009-April/022048.html Does same problem happens on i386? -- Paul