From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 07:32:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273BE16A4CE for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 07:32:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE7143D31 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 07:32:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from DeepCore.dk (sos.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.130]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2LFVr3i069728; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:32:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <405DB569.7040009@DeepCore.dk> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:31:53 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20040126 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Putinas Piliponis References: <405B9DCD.9040907@6by9.org> <0a0c01c40e90$2d86e070$32cba1cd@science1> <000401c40f33$86ce9210$1e64a8c0@spotripoli.local> <405D7D7F.3090209@DeepCore.dk> <001c01c40f41$34faf790$1e64a8c0@spotripoli.local> In-Reply-To: <001c01c40f41$34faf790$1e64a8c0@spotripoli.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.4 cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system lockup - ata spurious interrupts - somehow updated X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 15:32:10 -0000 Putinas Piliponis wrote: > I hope what sooner or later, you will have such hw. I wish I could provide > it, but I am not that rich. Nor am I or it would be here already :/ > One more question, with today kernel, vmstat -i doesn't list my second > sata controller as using irq at all. > I see what ata0 and ata1 are reporting using irq, but ata2 and ata3 is > using only > port. Does it mean, what my hardware generates interrupt even if it's > not asked > for ? No, its because interrupts are only listed on the two master devices (ie those on irq 14 & 15) for hysterical reasons. On PCI attached devices the irq from the atapciN device is used for both channels. -- -Søren