From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Mar 21 12:44:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA26190 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 21 Mar 1998 12:44:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tera.com (tera.tera.com [207.108.223.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA26173 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 1998 12:44:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tera.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with UUCP id MAA12409 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 21 Mar 1998 12:43:52 -0800 (PST) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.8.5/8.7.3) id MAA25115 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 21 Mar 1998 12:42:10 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Kline Message-Id: <199803212042.MAA25115@tao.thought.org> Subject: strangeness... To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Ports) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 12:42:09 -0800 (PST) Organization: <> thought.org: public access uNix in service... <> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Can anyone tell me why this port makefile fetch fails: DISTNAME= rftp-1.2 PKGNAME= rftp-1.2 CATEGORIES= network MASTER_SITES= http://www2.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/siliconex/38/rftp-1.2.tar.gz DISTFILES= rftp-1.2.tar.gz MAINTAINER= kline@thought.org MAN1= rftp.1 Running fetch on and retrieving the above tarball by hand works flawlessly, save for a Warning from fetch that the file may be hosed. It isn't. It has identical crc32 results as the original. Clues, people? --Also, I'd be much obliged to anybody who will test this utility. It ``restores'' bitmail- and ftpmail-retrieved files (often scores) into the original. thanks, gary -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service uNix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message