From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 01:09:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6666116A401; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk.360sip.com [72.236.70.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1800113C4B0; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([204.244.149.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3Q0VjnB076469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:31:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <462FF29E.6010501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:30:22 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <200704260011.l3Q0Bcxo039783@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070426001822.GA79250@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070426001822.GA79250@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/zaptel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/misc/zaptel/files patch-Makefile patch-qozap::Makefile patch-qozap::qozap_freebsd.c patch-tau32pci::tau32pci.c patch-test::Makefile patch-wcfxo::wcfxo.c patch-wcfxs::wcfxs.c patch-wct1xxp::wct1xxp.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:09:16 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Maxim, > > For some reason you have ignored at least 2 emails from portmgr > inquiring why you have been making apparently unapproved commits to > other people's ports (your previous 3 commits were such). Since you > are ignoring our private emails I have no choice but to ask you > publically to respond immediately. I apologize, due to some ages old filter (leftover from the time when I was on portmgr) the messages went into the wrong folder, which I don't check. Now I see them. Regarding the commits in question: are there any technical problems with my changes? If my memory serves in the past there were general agreement that maintainer's approval is good, but is not strictly required for the cases when the change is obvious. Unfortunately I don't have much spare time in my hands nowadays so that need to send e-mail for each of those small fixes could be a showstopper for me and result in them staying in my private tree. That being said, I don't ask to make an exception for me based on that and if you say that the policy now is that maintainer approval is strictly required I will adhere. Another generic note from my experience with other open source projects, is that usually ones with not-so-strict approval rules tend to make much faster progress. -Maxim