Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 23:36:04 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 266416] devel/py-backports.zoneinfo: Add missing dependancy on devel/py-backports Message-ID: <bug-266416-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D266416 Bug ID: 266416 Summary: devel/py-backports.zoneinfo: Add missing dependancy on devel/py-backports Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: leres@freebsd.org CC: python@FreeBSD.org, ygy@freebsd.org CC: python@FreeBSD.org, ygy@freebsd.org I have a system where I'd like to use security/zeek (indirectly depends on py-backports) and py-django41 (depends on devel/py-backports.zoneinfo) but = pkg thinks the two backports ports conflict. The pkg-descr for py-backports says: shared namespace shim for py-backports.* ports py-backports provides a common backports/__init__.py, which is shared among all py-backports.* ports. I built all four py-backports.* ports: devel/py-backports.cached-property=20=20 devel/py-backports.csv=20=20 devel/py-backports.entry-points-selectable devel/py-backports.zoneinfo and tried installing them with py-backports and found that only py-backports.csv can be installed without conflicting. I noticed that the py-backports.csv Makefile has a RUN_DEPENDS for py-backports so I tried add= ing one to the other ports but I still get: Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) - py39-backports.zoneinfo-0.2.1_1 conflicts with py39-backports-1 on /usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/backports/__init__.py Cannot solve problem using SAT solver, trying another plan Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Conflicts with the existing packages have been found. One more solver iteration is needed to resolve them. Looking at the various port Makefiles, I don't understand why py-backports.= csv works and the others do not. Maybe this is really a pkg bug? Anyway, it *lo= oks* like what I want *should* be possible. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-266416-7788>