From owner-freebsd-advocacy Mon Nov 13 19:43:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from spammie.svbug.com (mg136-070.ricochet.net [204.179.136.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6C237B479 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:43:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1]) by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA06422; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:45:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com) Message-Id: <200011140345.TAA06422@spammie.svbug.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:45:49 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com Reply-To: opentrax@email.com Subject: Re: accessing portal site To: wes@softweyr.com Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3A1027F9.81900EA3@softweyr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [I'm trimming the CC line. .. In the interest of sanity. :=) ] On 13 Nov, Wes Peters wrote: > Lanny Baron wrote: >> >>...[More triming]... > > No, he's just trying to get you to stop sending email that have the appearance > of collusion with the FreeBSD Project. If you want to send a "heads up" to > a FreeBSD mailing list, use BCC so the person or company you're sending the > mail to will not misconstrue your message as coming from or being approved by > the FreeBSD Project or the Advocacy group. > I appoligize, Wes, but I must concur with Lanny. Not that his behaviour is warrented, but he has valuable(sp?) and at this point it looks like we are only helping M$ by this arguement amoung us. I can take as much blame as anyone for extending this thread. However, the point remains - He has valuable information. And rather than accept it, we are shooting the messenger (along with his envelope). My point is that such information needs a medium. Where should the medium be? Jessem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message