From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Feb 6 17:07:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA19657 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:07:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (root@agora.rdrop.com [199.2.210.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA19636 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:07:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au by agora.rdrop.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #17) id m0vsem9-0008zHC; Thu, 6 Feb 97 17:06 PST Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.3/8.6.9) id IAA05338; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 08:40:19 +1100 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 08:40:19 +1100 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199702062140.IAA05338@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, terry@lambert.org Subject: Re: DOS partition trouble Cc: durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us, hackers@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> For SCSI disks with at least ncr controllers, this could be caused >> a DOS partition that ends on a cylinder boundary and FreeBSD partition >> that doesn't. When you remove the DOS partition, the controller's BIOS >> will have problems determining the disk geometry. > >What? The BIOS examines the disk to get the geometry? > >How do you put something on the disk in the first place, then? For disks with a nonexistent or empty partition table, the BIOS chooses a default (one with <= 1024 cylinders if possible. This is always possible for disks with < 63*255*1024 sectors). >I was under the impression that fictitious geometry was *always* >an artifact of the BIOS's idea of geometry, not the oter way around. That would usually fail for disks partitioned under another BIOS, especially under an old BIOS with a limited number of defaults. Bruce