From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 4 08:52:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA19160 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 08:52:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA19152 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 08:52:25 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA28254; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 09:52:16 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 1997 09:52:16 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199704041652.JAA28254@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Darren Reed , proff@suburbia.net, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP Filter in -current. In-Reply-To: <18999.860142214@time.cdrom.com> References: <199704040736.RAA23038@plum.cyber.com.au> <18999.860142214@time.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Someone should give this guy a labotamy if he's the one who came up > > with the "include every other include file in this include file" idea. > > "Labotomy", and I think Bruce is too valuable to even consider such a > radical treatment for him - how about trying direct debate with him > over this issue instead? ;-) The way I read it, Darren agrees with Bruce and disagrees that what he's doing is a 'bad thing'. Nate