From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 14 01:43:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EA4106564A for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBEE8FC0A for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q6E1iphx061729; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:44:51 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:44:51 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201207140144.q6E1iphx061729@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: emmakhaze@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: Broken link on your website X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:43:44 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 13 16:00:15 2012 > From: Emma Haze > Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 04:57:52 +0800 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Broken link on your website > > Hi! > > I just wanted to follow up with you regarding the email I had sent you > about the broken link I found on your website. Please let me know if you > had the chance to look at both the broken link and my suggested > replacement. It would be great if my resource was used. People looked. A *permanent* decisionwas made _NOT_ to use anything from your phoney diploma-mill website. > Please let me know what you think! We think you are an imbecilic spammer who couldn't catch a clue even if you doused yourself in clue musk, and did the clue-mating dance in the middle of a field full of randy clues, at the height of the clue-rutting season. How could _anyone_ possibly come to that conclusion, you ask? Hint #1: *NOBODY* at the address you have repeatedly spammed has anything to do with the site you found. Hint #2: What you found was a _copy_ -- a sadly out-of-date (four years or so) one -- of the official website. Hint #3: The _official_ website removed that broken link *YEARS* ago. Hint #4: Under no circumstances would the official site consider using anything fom someone who is incapable of figuring out the _correct_ contact address for the webmaster, and bombards a user-support mailing-list instead. Hint #5: There is no way that the *unmaintained* 'copy' site would ever use your 'resource'. If they were ever to update things, they would simply pull a newer copy of the official website. Which eliminates the out-of-date link. Now, *PLEASE* stop bombarding the innocent users of the support mailing-list with your ignorant, ill-informed, impossible-of-fullfilment nonsense. Continued spamming off the mailing-list might well result in numerous people deciding to forward all their junk email to you, as 'thanks' for wasting their time.