From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 20:48:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D7816A4CE for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:48:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from forrie.com (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.45.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C20043D2D for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-25.forrie.net. [192.168.1.25]) by forrie.com with ESMTP id i82KllUO046182; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:47:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Message-ID: <413786F3.3030006@forrie.com> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 16:47:47 -0400 From: Forrest Aldrich User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7+ (Windows/20040830) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Khera References: <4137822F.4030606@forrie.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.0(snapshot 20010925) (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com) X-MailScanner-LocalNet: Found to be clean cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postfix (current and release) issues... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:48:01 -0000 Okay, perhaps posting a message to postfix-users will illicit a response ;-) I'm also running into more conflicts on the official release port. Though I'd much prefer to work with -current. ===> Extracting for postfix-2.1.4,1 ===> Vulnerability check disabled >> Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-2.1.4.tar.gz. ===> Patching for postfix-2.1.4,1 echo "See header_checks.5.html" > /usr/ports/mail/postfix/work/postfix-2.1.4/html/body_checks.5.html ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/mail/postfix/work/pfixtls-0.8.18-2.1.3-0.9.7d/pfixtls.diff ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for postfix-2.1.4,1 File to patch: Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Sep 2, 2004, at 4:27 PM, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > >> The port for the official release of postfix is failing the patches >> (reported to maintainer, awaiting a response). Does anyone have a >> clean patch for this or did I hit a bug. >> > > The SPF patch and the TLS patches conflict. Nobody has stepped up to > provide versions that play together well, like the IPv6+TLS combo patch.