From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 15:53:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD04716A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:53:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A17743D55 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:53:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 66673 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 15:53:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wKDi9twzehD2hNbDPvCpdvyFBjC5zPqfofvJbEiyaezMYJB+zkfm0vKDic2668QfxEv4E8FiB0FjH7LHfwPHzsl+1ahJSd6m+M0ZsSUGEjKHUC8U96lQd3QPyGi/veqNQfynT6PrHQvKg03gq2H/yjrS7cDRjI0bMBIMjo42y0c= ; Message-ID: <20051227155311.66671.qmail@web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:53:11 PST Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:53:11 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: dick hoogendijk , freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20051227150654.GA1055@arwen.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:53:12 -0000 --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 27 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > > --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > > > > > On 26 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > > > > > > > It doesn't really matter what the > "accepted" standard is; its the > > > > one that *most* people are using. > > > > > > Bring this "rule" to society and it won't > take all that much time > > > before we'll live in a jungle (happely ever > after ? ;-) > > > > > > It's the decease of this era that lost of > people find it diffcult to > > > honor rules except their own. > > > > > > I know the saying "money makes the world > turn around" > > > I disagree. > > > > Well if you're going to snip all of the > context out then you can't > > possibly have a credible argument. You might > as well go work for a > > newspaper. > > I think my argument stands. The context is in > the threat (as you well > know, because it's been written by you). I think you mean "thread" here? I didn't start the thread. But you can't ignore reality. Reality is that most people use IE. So if you ignore that fact, then you are not good at your job of designing websites, because it is a key factor. They don't make seats in busses 3' wide because some people are really fat. They make them so that the majority of people can fit comfortably in them (well, reasonably comfortably anyway). If you worry about every case, then you cheat the majority, and your product is less useful. > > Furthermore you don't seem to think highly of > people working for > newspapers. > Personally I don't look down on people, no > matter their work nor social > status. My point is that newspapers are spinsters, as they often take a word or phrase out of context to make a story fit their agenda. It has nothing to do with the status of the people who work there, only their ethics and motivations, which are to make things appear the way they think will generate the most interest; not the truth. DT __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/