From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Fri Jul 31 22:33:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6D59AF8A7 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:33:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6484E1F8 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:33:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id t6VMXhNN093445 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:33:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id t6VMXhx6093442 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:33:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:33:43 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: VirtualBox VMs with large amounts of RAM Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:33:43 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:33:44 -0000 It seems I can reliably lock up my 10-STABLE amd64 VirtualBox host by giving a Windows 7 VM more than about 12G of RAM. The VM starts, the mouse gets draggy and then the whole system hardlocks. This is on a system with 16G total, so there should be plenty left for the host (no ZFS). Is this a known problem?