From owner-freebsd-tinderbox@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  1 11:06:15 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-tinderbox@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: tinderbox@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A721065672;
	Mon,  1 Jun 2009 11:06:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru)
Received: from 0.mx.codelabs.ru (0.mx.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0298FC08;
	Mon,  1 Jun 2009 11:06:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru;
	h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender;
	b=QPfSHCiBtT33HhK9b9MXWplYCU+5vHAgrSB4a3JD8BZP4q103qdXhaNUwIEkpzt9X0b6xClLynUf8XprCJ5bkPtJcsTT8ppb8qc43nDyLyVzEHua9vkRYKKYJRaYAPmGp74btKLZpWVFRLqfqtDyLawXgzC5CRfoHAs2oPL7bUk=;
Received: from void.codelabs.ru (void.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.25])
	by 0.mx.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	id 1MB5LJ-000HzH-KU; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:06:13 +0400
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:06:10 +0400
From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>
To: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <yoXtrgLwEhUUUVB9yEfuiR+hmzM@j4OYE6OL8eALCd4BvSxIfwgoxSc>
References: <20090601042258.909C77302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
	<4A2360BC.8040109@FreeBSD.org>
	<gOVq8M8vb7iy5IfrH3ERMpB2m2Y@aAvl70UcjNQBOOyiGNKFwlNO6Qw>
	<4A239B7C.8020403@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A239B7C.8020403@gmx.de>
Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru
Cc: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>,
	current@freebsd.org, ia64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru
List-Id: "Tinderbox reports, responses,
	and meta-comments" <freebsd-tinderbox.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-tinderbox>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-tinderbox-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-tinderbox>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-tinderbox-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-tinderbox>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-tinderbox-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:06:15 -0000

Christoph, good day.

Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 11:12:28AM +0200, Christoph Mallon wrote:
> Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb:
> > This is very weird (judging by the GCC's manual) since the simplest C
> > program,
> > -----
> > int main(void)
> > {
> > 	return 0;
> > }
> > 
> > void foo(void) __attribute__ ((unused))
> > {
> > 	return;
> > }
> > -----
> > but ICC 10.x produces the same error and happily chewes __attribute__
> > on the function prototype.  Anyway, I see no warnings even without
> > '((unused)) attribute with -Wall, so '__attribute__ ((unused))' looks
> > like no-op nowadays.
> 
> There is no warning about foo() being unused, because it is not static.

Yes, you're perfectly right.  Thanks for education!
-- 
Eygene
 _                ___       _.--.   #
 \`.|\..----...-'`   `-._.-'_.-'`   #  Remember that it is hard
 /  ' `         ,       __.--'      #  to read the on-line manual
 )/' _/     \   `-_,   /            #  while single-stepping the kernel.
 `-'" `"\_  ,_.-;_.-\_ ',  fsc/as   #
     _.-'_./   {_.'   ; /           #    -- FreeBSD Developers handbook
    {_.-``-'         {_/            #