From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 18 18:20:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0065837B401 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:20:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.fillmore-labs.com (lima.fillmore-labs.com [62.138.193.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A1443F75 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:20:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from pd958af64.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.88.175.100] helo=fillmore-labs.com ident=6w8i812lqpok2nzn) by mx2.fillmore-labs.com with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.20) id 19dgOI-000DCg-10; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 03:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: <3F189CBE.3030307@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 03:19:58 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Rogness References: <20030718153643.V7503-100000@skywalker.rogness.net> In-Reply-To: <20030718153643.V7503-100000@skywalker.rogness.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH X-Complaints-To: abuse@fillmore-labs.com cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Normal build behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 01:20:05 -0000 Nick Rogness wrote: > I'm testing a perl port that I want to submit. Before I submit it, I want > to be sure it passes the 'Recommended test ordering' listed in the > Porters-handbook. In doing some testing, I looked at several other p5 > ports in ports/net. I ran across something interesting. > > [...] > sdn-ns# make deinstall > ===> Deinstalling for net/p5-Socks > ===> p5-SOCKS-0.03 has a different PREFIX: /usr/local > ., skipping > > Is this normal for deinstallation? If I try to 'make reinstall' after > this, it looks as if the port is STILL installed: > [...] > > Is this behavior normal? portlint says the port is OK. Please advise. Welcome to the new make deinstall code, your thread starts here: the patch from Joe Marcus Clarke should help. But feel free to bug portmgr@, it's broken... They are a little busy though, because of the gcc 3.3 migration. Regards Oliver