From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 20:17:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80280E13; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339198FC08; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:cc83:142f:c735:4700]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8AC644AC33; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:17:43 +0400 (MSK) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:17:41 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1336007393.20121120001741@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Today's wireless update - TL;DR - please test -HEAD In-Reply-To: References: <50A49138.3080700@gmail.com> <50A52547.6030402@gmail.com> <50A86AB6.3050502@gmail.com> <50A86D6F.807@gmail.com> <769502.20121119235515@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1757912873.20121120000939@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:17:45 -0000 Hello, Adrian. You wrote 20 =D0=BD=D0=BE=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2012 =D0=B3., 0:12:54: AC> No, you need two cards. Sorry, but anything else in hostap mode is AC> just plain madness. AC> It's possible to do other dirty hacks (eg make p2p work, multiple AC> station VAPs, each on different channels) but that's not currently how AC> net80211 works. So, if (BIG IF) it is possible, it will be channel hoping anyway? Hardware doesn't support working on two channels with two raidomodules (I mean, 9380, I know that 9280 doesn't support that), am I right? Channel hoping is not interesting solution anyway :) And thank you for all your work and effort! --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov