From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 31 18:46:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4658416A46C for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkc@dreamfire.com) Received: from dreamfire.com (dreamfire.com [192.220.72.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB9E13C48A for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkc@dreamfire.com) Received: (qmail 69098 invoked by uid 18638); 31 Jul 2007 18:46:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:46:01 -0700 From: Bruce Caruthers To: Adam J Richardson Message-ID: <20070731114601.A55698@dreamfire.com> References: <20070731030320.A40177@dreamfire.com> <20070731112945.A19820@dreamfire.com> <46AF80ED.7090708@crackmonkey.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <46AF80ED.7090708@crackmonkey.us>; from fatman.uk@gmail.com on Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:35:25PM +0100 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: DOH! ata_alloc_request failed! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bruce Caruthers List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:46:03 -0000 On Tue Jul 31, 2007, Adam J Richardson wrote: > Bruce Caruthers wrote: > >> Um... should I be concerned? > > Hi Bruce, > > I've found wherever hard disks are doing anything suspicious, such as > operating properly, it's best to be paranoid. Take multiple copies quick > is my advice. > > Adam J Richardson Well, the entire system is just over a week old, so I would *hope* nothing is already failing. Also, the other reports I saw indicated a memory leak in ataraid or somewhere related. This system is meant to be the new master copy, from which backups will be taken, so I'd like to track down what the problem is, hw or sw. (Original server is still holding its own for now, but I don't want to have to constantly re-verify the copies, plus the old server is maxed out and giving signs of dying...) -bkc