From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 12 09:00:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AED106566B for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45988FC19 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PyKPN-00064x-UZ for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:42:46 -0800 Message-ID: <31131280.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:42:45 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <31131269.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl References: <4D7943B1.1030604@FreeBSD.org> <31131269.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Compiler Benchmark: gcc-base vs. gcc-ports vs. clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:00:18 -0000 "Core i7 based procesors run slower with -march=core2 (new option) on the system compiler than with -march=nocona" Sorry for double mail, isn't CPUTYPE=core2 just alias to nocona with base compiler? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Compiler-Benchmark%3A-gcc-base-vs.-gcc-ports-vs.-clang-tp31119986p31131280.html Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.