From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 7 22:31:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF08F16A4E5 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 22:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F22243D53 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 22:31:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4F7B840; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:31:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on zoraida.natserv.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.3 Received: from 35st-server.simplicato.com (static-71-249-233-130.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.249.233.130]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D01AB838; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:31:05 -0400 (EDT) References: <20060706235712.A1171@ganymede.hub.org> <44AE5240.2080200@bitfreak.org> <44AEC800.8050509@bitfreak.org> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Darren Pilgrim Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:31:04 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: FreeBSD ISP Subject: Re: IAMP servers in FreeBSD for ISP X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 22:31:08 -0000 Darren Pilgrim writes: > That's exactly how it's supposed to work. After the initial > authentication, A isn't doing any real work, just passing packets > between the client and the backend server. If I recall correctly the one thing I found dissapointing was that the proxy machine used just as much memory for the proxy service as a the real imap connections. Right now I am leaning towards Cyrus.. Specially now that it has replication. Going to switch my home/test bed to Cyrus..