From owner-freebsd-net  Mon Dec 30 20:14:57 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA0D37B401
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from patrocles.silby.com (d140.as9.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.133.206])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733BD43EA9
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:14:54 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from patrocles.silby.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBV4Lp8U025436;
	Mon, 30 Dec 2002 22:21:51 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from localhost (silby@localhost)
	by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id gBV4LTbB025432;
	Mon, 30 Dec 2002 22:21:40 -0600 (CST)
X-Authentication-Warning: patrocles.silby.com: silby owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 22:21:29 -0600 (CST)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru>
Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, "" <net@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ep(4) does not support mediaopt full-duplex
In-Reply-To: <20021231102631.A2838@grosbein.pp.ru>
Message-ID: <20021230221357.H25392-100000@patrocles.silby.com>
References: <3E0FF43E.9A5063@kuzbass.ru> <20021230.135235.55510128.imp@bsdimp.com>
 <20021231102631.A2838@grosbein.pp.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Eugene Grosbein wrote:

> So I conclude 3C589D does support full duplex at the hardware level.
>
> Eugene Grosbein

Ok, I'm getting confused here...

You say you're using a 3C589D, which is detected by if_ep_pccard.c as
such:

        case 0x9058: /* 3C589 */
                return ("3Com Etherlink III 3C589");

However, in if_xlreg.h, I see us define the following:

#define TC_DEVICEID_CYCLONE_10_100_COMBO        0x9058

Are these actually both the same card, or are PCI and PCCARD IDs
unrelated?  If they are the same card, then clearly the solution is to
make if_xl work with the card instead of if_ep. :)

Mike "Silby" Silbersack

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message