From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 18 18:58:20 2010
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id F21981065696; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:58:20 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:58:20 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Gabor PALI <pgj@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20100818185820.GC43513@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201008181153.o7IBrvlo010634@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20100818184746.GA43513@FreeBSD.org>
	<AANLkTik7BVJrxoLewQNQkJ-9Qy7rtyFuXzAoE8EFK8MV@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik7BVJrxoLewQNQkJ-9Qy7rtyFuXzAoE8EFK8MV@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Andrej Zverev <az@freebsd.org>,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/p5-Config-Model Makefile distinfo
	pkg-plist
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:58:21 -0000

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:53:27PM +0200, Gabor PALI wrote:
> 2010/8/18 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>:
> > I can't understand why people keep making this mistake after it
> > was discussed so many times on the lists.
> 
> And now it is also documented in the Porter's Handbook :)

Yes, that's why I mentioned section 5.7.2.  :-)

> I think you should really submit a patch to portlint(1) as well, since
> (as I mentioned you previously) it emits a warning on this solution.

Right, I guess it's time to take care of portlint(1) as well.  Will
work out a patch.

./danfe