From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Nov 4 15:01:51 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA19892 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 15:01:51 -0800 Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA19885 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 15:01:45 -0800 Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA06707; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 15:01:23 -0800 Message-Id: <199511042301.PAA06707@rah.star-gate.com> To: Gary Palmer cc: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: Anyone got FreeBSD working a P6? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 04 Nov 1995 22:38:43 GMT." <1434.815524723@palmer.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 04 Nov 1995 15:01:22 -0800 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>> Gary Palmer said: > Greg Lehey wrote in message ID > <199511042149.WAA21203@allegro.lemis.de>: > > Amancio Hasty Jr. writes: > > > > > > I was just reading comp.sys.intel and the 200Mhz P6's performance looks > > > really cool 8) > > > Don't believe it. The magazines over here are full of the fact that > > it's a flop, since it takes forever to change from 32 to 16 bit mode > > and back again. > > Who cares about 16 bit mode? FreeBSD is a *32* bit system, so it's not > affected AFAIK :-) > > Gary > > Actually, it will be nice if we can demonstrate how great FreeBSD is on a P6 given that Win95 has problems right now due to its 16bit code. Enjoy, Amancio