Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:22:01 -0800 From: Joshua Tinnin <jtinnin@pacbell.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Derrick Edwards <dantavious@comcast.net> Subject: Re: SKYPE Sound Problems Message-ID: <200412171222.02560.jtinnin@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <200412171959.26989.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <200411211341.10072.dantavious@comcast.net> <200412171946.05130.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200412171959.26989.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 17 December 2004 10:59 am, Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> wrote: > On Friday, 17. December 2004 19:45, I wrote: > > With that modification, run artsdsp esd and test some app that uses > > esound (like xmms with the esound output plugin enabled). fstat > > /dev/dsp* should only show artsdsp. > > N.B.: artsdsp esd -nobeeps -as 1 is probably better for real-world > usage, since this makes the wrapped esd release the device after 1 > second of idle time, allowing artsd to to the same (if configured > that way). Oh yeah and -nobeeps is probably self-explaining 8-). Actually, I find that sysctl works fine with virtual channels. Is there any advantage one way or another? Seems to me like virtual channels is a bit more ... elegant, but I'm not sure if it would matter. Thanks for the patch either way, as it might come in handy, and it's always good to learn about more than one way to solve a problem. - jt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200412171222.02560.jtinnin>