From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 28 02:30:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2ADB16A53D for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8C14445E for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 01:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5S1U2fJ038304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:30:02 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id k5S1TxvC064004; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:29:59 +0700 (ICT) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:29:59 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200606280129.k5S1TxvC064004@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: kyrreny@broadpark.no In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20060627135153.021cece8@broadpark.no> (message from Kyrre Nygard on Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:06:22 +0200) References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060627135153.021cece8@broadpark.no> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named: invalid rndc key X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:30:23 -0000 > $ rndc reload > rndc: connection to remote host closed > This may indicate that the remote server is using an older version of > the command protocol, this host is not authorized to connect, > or the key is invalid. Did you check that named was still listeing on port tcp 953? What does "netstat -Sa|grep rndc" tells you? Can you telnet localhost 953? Did you check that rndc and named are of the same version? Calling rndc with no argument should give you the version, and any dig request should give you the version of named. Do they have the same installation date? Best regards, Olivier