From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 31 00:00:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEFE16A4CE for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:00:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E827243D2D for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:00:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0V80dA0018921; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:00:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0V80cO3018920; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:00:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:00:38 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jem Matzan Message-ID: <20040131080038.GE18624@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <1075530947.840.2.camel@.rochester.rr.com> <20040131074830.GA18624@dragon.nuxi.com> <1075535725.1189.4.camel@.rochester.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075535725.1189.4.camel@.rochester.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: FreeBSD/AMD64 list Subject: Re: XFree86 build X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:00:41 -0000 On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 02:55:25AM -0500, Jem Matzan wrote: > On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 02:48, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:35:47AM -0500, Jem Matzan wrote: > > > What's in your /etc/make.conf? I have CPUTYPE?=?x86_64 for the CPU > > > type, > > > > That is so totally wrong, I don't know where the idea could have come > > from. There is a single AMD64 implimentation at this time, so there are > > no choices (or things to tweak). x86_64 is Linux's bastardized spelling > > of "AMD64". > > Hey that's wonderful, but do you have a suggestion as to what the > CPUTYPE should be? Yes, don't set it.