From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 18:11:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1232016A421 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:11:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD4143D98 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:07:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 17025 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2005 18:06:12 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Aug 2005 18:06:12 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7132349; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:06:11 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050828234043.H22315@maren.thelosingend.net> <20050829161506.E2522@maren.thelosingend.net> <43131C85.1070100@meijome.net> <20050829170053.M3014@maren.thelosingend.net> <43133BA5.2010608@scls.lib.wi.us> <20050830091919.J13913@maren.thelosingend.net> <82746FA7-5934-46C4-BF7F-F5295EF51A8C@mac.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 30 Aug 2005 14:06:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <82746FA7-5934-46C4-BF7F-F5295EF51A8C@mac.com> Message-ID: <44hdd7l2p8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: rsync and moving files [Re: backup w/ snapshots] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:11:01 -0000 Charles Swiger writes: > On Aug 30, 2005, at 3:32 AM, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > > Yes, that's correct! But let's say I keep more than one snapshot > > around. I > > maybe didn't mention this, but this the sole purpose of using > > snapshots; > > for me to have more full backups laying around. > > A snapshot on the same disk does not qualify as a reliable backup of > your data. No, but it is convenient to restore from, when it's intact. This is actually a very common case; accidental file deletions. > Using rsync to copy a tree of stuff to another machine would. And as long as one is doing that, there's no reason not to use snapshots as well.