Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 7 May 2019 12:11:02 +0100
From:      Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org>
To:        Dave B <g8kbvdave@googlemail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: firefox 66.0.3 disables noscript
Message-ID:  <16d62dc9-dd1f-57ee-287e-2618f0309c50@qeng-ho.org>
In-Reply-To: <26069e39-44e4-42d7-aaaa-581c92afa8bf@googlemail.com>
References:  <mailman.106.1557144002.2568.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <26069e39-44e4-42d7-aaaa-581c92afa8bf@googlemail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/05/2019 09:14, Dave B via freebsd-questions wrote:
> You can tell FF not to check certificates for add-on's, without
> affecting the usual certificate system.
> 
> That is what I did to "restore" add-on functionality.   (But I only have
> one, "Ublock Origin", replaces addblock+ and no-script. Very low impact
> and no need to continually faff about with scriping settings.)
> 
> ~ ~ ~
> 
> From ZDnet:-
> 
> For Firefox users that are currently impacted by this bug, an easy
> workaround would be to visit the  about:config  section and set 
> xpinstall.signatures.required  to false. This disables the extension
> signing mechanism in Firefox, the system through which the browser
> verifies that the local extension is one that's been installed from the
> central Mozilla Add-ons repository --and for which the signing
> certificate had expired.
> 
> ~ ~ ~
> 
> However, it's now fixed, in other major OS version of FF, so perhaps
> someone needs to update the F'BSD version.

It was updated in ports two days ago

https://www.freshports.org/www/firefox/

-- 
What do we want?
A time machine!
When do we want it?
Errm ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16d62dc9-dd1f-57ee-287e-2618f0309c50>