Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 23:30:21 -0700 From: "Chris Csanady" <cc@tarsier.ca.sandia.gov> To: Atipa <freebsd@atipa.com> Cc: Tony Kimball <alk@pobox.com>, rotel@indigo.ie, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPro vs PII Message-ID: <199806300630.XAA09584@tarsier.ca.sandia.gov> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Jun 1998 21:24:47 MDT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.980629212119.9695C-100000@altrox.atipa.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> : Yes, but benchmarks at tomshardware.com have already established >> : that the 100Mhz memory bus offers little improvement over the 66Mhz >> : bus on a PII. >> >> Kinda sad, to be squabbling about the tiny differences between >> PII/PPro, when G3, Alpha, and UltraSparc systems are whipping the >> '86s by much more substantial margins. What's SpecInt95/SpecFP95 on a >> 450MHz G3, anyhow? > >The SPECfp95 for their new 400MHz chip w/ 1MB L2 (400MHz) is 13.7, >compared to 23.5 for a Sun Ultra60 Model 360. Meanwhile, I think the new Alpha is safely keeping its lead. :) KP21264-3.5X Est. 43 SPECint95/64 SPECfp95 I must say, there is nothing like breakthrough after breakthrough from intel. Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806300630.XAA09584>