From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May  3 18:49:21 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B1FAA16A4CE; Mon,  3 May 2004 18:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net (mtaw4.prodigy.net [64.164.98.52])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 85EDD43D48; Mon,  3 May 2004 18:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(b6631b173380bc8c02510b18e21e965c@adsl-67-115-73-128.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net
	[67.115.73.128])
	by mtaw4.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i441nKfj000242;
	Mon, 3 May 2004 18:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 02139528DF; Mon,  3 May 2004 18:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 18:49:19 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Deng XueFeng <dsnofe@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <20040504014919.GA57723@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20040502132115.C583.DSNOFE@hotmail.com>
	<200405031322.37241.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20040504090033.B046.DSNOFE@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040504090033.B046.DSNOFE@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Is this LOST??
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 01:49:21 -0000


--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:04:53AM +0800, Deng XueFeng wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 May 2004 01:26 am, Deng XueFeng wrote:
> > > I found the htonl implemention in libc for i386 is not sync with the
> > > kern.
> > >
> > > sys use bswap for swaping the int. but libc still use xchg.
> > > IS THIS LOST?
> >=20
> > It's because libc still supports 80386 which doesn't have bswap (introd=
uced on=20
> > the 486 IIRC).  The kernel only supports 486+ unless you explicitly bui=
ld an=20
> > 80386 kernel, which won't use bswap for htonl().
> Since 5-current kernel do not support 80386.
> why keep libc(5-current) support 80386?

5-current does support 80386, just not in the default GENERIC kernel.

Kris

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAlvafWry0BWjoQKURAhqMAJ0YkHFWZqv9cRP31hUB7lZssHyn7ACfV07z
Hk0Q+qyO4f+goBtakaWV8Pk=
=/AZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--