From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 16:57:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B7A106566C; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA28C8FC0C; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn7 with SMTP id 7so4525023iwn.13 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:57:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VY6M9aiS0xDgvMoERF2l+p/ECNiHWDaFz/LEhknh31M=; b=S3eKNKHEDqm+4bkeiDNSc5u/e0Qk0+R0u3CBsbe3xqiHugFy08BqXc2aDbIdK/8/KT cedQbQQ12O/08pSfEqsyzlalRlp/axG29ZElkSV6wYt4dvKa8UibHyAdFUp7EcVAZrpN +Ns60zBolVm+o5fhLvYnMwJMPVidgW/MMtUpE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=PvFTXvhtD3TIvxXoCT1oW0G2GlTUQaK9KglXFw00iHb8n0V2gbTmxgWUeRp1Dclg4m z3rHojXHe4CxPlr4Loa4t+2X2VIpHM6UTKibN6IWOrLzz7bBp+JLahFhnACcFsZiVfF0 ZK+fgfqzTMzuINslM+55aoW66Wbih/L/ya/ac= Received: by 10.231.59.80 with SMTP id k16mr6098696ibh.114.1277139433423; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from centel.dataix.local (adsl-99-181-128-180.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net [99.181.128.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r12sm2529047ibi.14.2010.06.21.09.57.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Message-ID: <4C1F99E6.30202@dataix.net> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:57:10 -0400 From: jhell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100620 Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= References: <20100617101541.GA90363@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4C1A117A.9060608@dataix.net> <20100618085018.GA94427@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4C1B63A1.3010604@dataix.net> <8639wgfnrk.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4C1F8444.80002@dataix.net> <86mxuofj40.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86mxuofj40.fsf@ds4.des.no> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=89D8547E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r209240 ia64 -> buildworld -> undefined reference to `lzma_physmem' X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:57:15 -0000 On 06/21/2010 12:25, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > jhell writes: >> Sure, the only difference here is you just seem to have added >> cleandepend for extra added surety but is unneeded if the obj >> directory is assumed empty. > > Assumption is the mother of all f***ups. The mother of your particular > f***up is the assumption that all headers are in /usr/src/include. His return post confirmed it was a clean obj. Where did the rest of the answers go ? I have not had to deal with this since: r208258 | mm | 2010-05-18 05:59:09 -0400 (Tue, 18 May 2010) | 16 lines And have no way to test it out if it solves the problem but sure it could be worked through without the attitude & flames that you bring to this thread. > > DES Wow really! your getting that upset you have to start cussing. I just hope that because of your incorrect addition to what you say building the includes improperly is a f***up and being called out on, just like the other patch we've discussed that you so claim had two files in it that you can't own up to does not have anything to do with this. As to the point before you start pointing fingers as you are so gracious to do lately - The steps laid out are the steps I had once took to correct the similar problem. And I seem to be running on these systems fairly well mind you. If you would like to take your aggressions off-list Ill be more than willing to oblige. Praying for you, -- jhell