Date: Thu, 13 Feb 97 11:50:16 -0600 From: Ben Black <black@gage.com> To: Walter Hafner <hafner@forwiss.tu-muenchen.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UltraSPARC and MicroSPARC vs Pentium Pro ? Message-ID: <9702131750.AA25979@squid.gage.com> In-Reply-To: <199702131745.SAA29349@forwiss.tu-muenchen.de> References: <199702120330.TAA15056@f30.hotmail.com> <199702121833.KAA18506@freefall.freebsd.org> <s9nk9ocr7po.fsf@suncog13.forwiss.tu-muenchen.de> <9702131713.AA25713@squid.gage.com> <199702131745.SAA29349@forwiss.tu-muenchen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> so a 133MHz P5 beats a 60MHz SuperSPARC? amazing.
>
>Yup! And that's not just benchmarks. Our "real live" applications are
>faster on the P5 too ("Real live" means mainly byte-images).
this is sarcasm. the pentium and supersparc are the same generation of
CPUs. it is no suprise that doubling the clock speed of one makes it faster.
b3n
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9702131750.AA25979>