From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 09:25:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FDF16A4CF for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:25:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D8A43D1F for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:25:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1EHPlOE004501; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:25:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1EHPlcM060912; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:25:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1EHPlcV060911; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:25:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:25:47 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: John Duncan Message-ID: <20040214172547.GA60877@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <86smhe0we8.fsf@optusnet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86smhe0we8.fsf@optusnet.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building Linux Programs on 5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:25:48 -0000 On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 08:48:31PM +1000, John Duncan wrote: > However I have a problem with the Linux base ports.The version 7 and > 8 ports both fail when fetching XFree86-dev and the 6 version which gets > this rpm has too old a glibc for Poplog. I tried to install the Debian > port but it also fails to fetch some unrelated files and aborts. > Is this just bad timing or do others have these problems? Would an > update of the whole port system help? I happened to fetch all three of them yesterday with the latest ports tree. This included linux_devtools as well. 6 installed fine (both ports). 7 installed fine after manually removing the remnants of 6 (both ports). 8 didn't install (linux_base) because it tried to mknod null in ${WRKDIR}, which failed. So, yes I think it helps to update the ports tree. FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net