From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 2 15:10:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3C9F33 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B1A8FC08 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB2FA2Ij026574 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:10:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qB2F9dfJ044711; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:09:39 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Subject: Re: New jail does not understand nullfs From: Ian Lepore To: Matt Donovan In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:09:39 -0700 Message-ID: <1354460979.69940.627.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 15:10:04 -0000 On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 01:17 -0600, Matt Donovan wrote: > When attempting to start the jail in question the following happens > > > server# jail -c poudriere > jail: poudriere: unknown parameter: allow.mount.nullfs > > > Below is my jail.conf > > poudriere { > name=poudriere; > host.hostname=poudriere; > ip4.addr="192.168.1.30"; > persist; > children.max=10; > allow.mount; > mount.devfs; > allow.mount.nullfs; > allow.raw_sockets; > allow.socket_af; > allow.sysvipc; > enforce_statfs=1; > path=/newsystem/jail/poudriere; > exec.stop="umount -a"; > } > > Does the switch not work yet? As I am using CURRENT with the latest > revision. > That "mount.devfs" doesn't look right, should that have "allow." on the front? I wonder if that's the problem and the error report is off by one line or something? -- Ian