From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 17 09:36:45 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D479E37B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0.freebsd-services.com (survey.codeburst.net
	[195.149.39.161])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8538543FDD
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from paul@freebsd-services.com)
Received: by mx0.freebsd-services.com (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id 2BEA41B212; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:36:43 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:36:43 +0100
From: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Message-ID: <20030417163642.GI23466@survey.codeburst.net>
References: <20030414192627.C32D543F3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
	<20030414170306.C70262@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
	<20030414211310.I5215@hub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030414211310.I5215@hub.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: pawel.worach@telia.com
cc: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) process lock
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:36:46 -0000

On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 09:13:54PM +0000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> 
> > Pawel,
> >
> > Last I've heard, SCHED_ULE isn't SMP friendly.

I've got big problems with current now.

I haven't been able to build a SCHED_ULE working kernel since 11 April.
It has dies with the blockable sleep lock as per this thread and I've
been trying a new kernel each day but it's still broken.

I tried to track down the commit and I know it exists in a kernel built
later than 12th but I haven't pinpointed the exact commit yet.

To make things worse though, I tried to build a SCHED_4BSD kernel to see
if it was ULE specific and I'm seeing different problems with that
kernel. In X keypresses are getting duplicated i.e. I press a key and it
appears multiple times. If I come back to a tty then after a while it
all just locks up solid.

For me at least current is very sick at the moment.

Paul.