From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jan  5 22:08:05 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA05350
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 22:08:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA05311
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 22:07:49 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA30386;
	Tue, 6 Jan 1998 17:03:48 +1100
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 17:03:48 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199801060603.RAA30386@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: LINT is missing examples for sio1-3 ? GENERIC does so
Cc: andreas@klemm.gtn.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> No.  LINT is suppose to have the minimal number of entries to give an
>> instance of each type.  Only a few bogus entries breake this rule (grep
>> for [a-z]1).
>
>But what about showing also different instance/flag combinations?  I
>don't see how it hurts to do that as separate entries if the
>alternative is to muddy a single entry to the point of confusion.

OK, but the proposed change just copied lines from GENERIC to give
uninteresting differences in the port, irq and disable flag.

Bruce